FactIQ
Browse documentation

Follow the public executive narrative

Find what executives emphasized in interviews, podcasts, conferences, and television—and compare that public story with what they told investors.

On this page

Start here

Use executive media to discover themes and differences across venues. Treat every FactIQ media finding as a sourced summary until you verify the linked video.

Discover

Find where an executive discussed a topic outside formal earnings calls.

Compare

See whether the framing changed across time, audiences, or venues.

Verify

Follow the timestamped source before quoting exact words or judging tone.

Choose the question before the appearances

Media research is strongest when it resolves a focused question, not when it produces a list of videos.

Where did they discuss it?

Find the most relevant interviews, conferences, podcasts, or television appearances for one theme.

How did the story change?

Build a dated timeline for one executive or company and look for a genuine change in position.

Was the investor story different?

Compare public appearances with exact earnings-call evidence from similar dates.

Find a public narrative

Start with one company or executive, one concrete theme, and a date window. Ask for the conclusion before the appearance list.
  1. 01

    Name the theme

    Use concrete language such as export controls, pricing, hiring, capex, demand, or a named product.
  2. 02

    Set the scope

    Choose the executive or company and publication dates that matter.
  3. 03

    Ask for the change

    Request the main takeaway, strongest supporting and conflicting appearances, and a dated timeline.
Executive-media research
How have Nvidia executives discussed export controls outside earnings calls from 2024 through 2026? Start with the main takeaway, then show the strongest supporting and conflicting appearances. For each, include the executive and role, an unquoted summary of what they said, video title, channel, publication date, appearance type, and timestamped link. Show how the public narrative changed over time, but do not infer exact wording or tone from FactIQ's summaries. Note important gaps in company, speaker, channel, and date coverage.

For a long timeline, split the work into non-overlapping date windows and carry the sourced findings forward. This keeps older appearances visible when a broad search reaches its result limit.

Compare the media story with the investor story

The interesting result is not that wording differs. It is that the emphasis, specificity, or position changes after accounting for venue, audience, and timing.
Media-versus-earnings research
Does Jensen Huang frame export controls differently in public interviews than in Nvidia earnings calls from 2024 through 2026? Check coverage for both sources and compare similar dates. Start with the answer and the two or three clearest differences or consistencies. For media, use unquoted summaries with person, role, title, channel, publication date, and timestamped link. For earnings calls, use exact quotes with speaker, role, call date, fiscal period, section, and citation. Explain how venue, audience, and timing could account for the difference, and note any coverage gaps.
  • Compare the same person, company, theme, and similar calendar window.
  • Use publication dates for media and call dates plus fiscal periods for earnings.
  • Keep media summaries and exact earnings quotations visibly separate.
  • Consider the interviewer, audience, venue, and question context before claiming a changed position.
  • Include the strongest evidence against the comparison and what source check would overturn it.

Read and cite a media result correctly

FactIQ points you to a specific moment in a public appearance. The returned text is a structured summary of that moment, not a transcript excerpt.

What was said

An unquoted FactIQ summary of the relevant claim or passage

Who and where

Executive and role, company when available, video title, channel, and appearance type

When

Publication or upload date, which may differ from the recording or event date

How to verify

A timestamped link to the source video

Avoid

“The CEO said, ‘[FactIQ media summary].’”

Use

“FactIQ summarizes [executive] as saying [unquoted summary] in a video published on [date]. [Title, channel, timestamped link]. Exact wording not independently verified.”

If wording, hedging, or tone is important to the conclusion, open the timestamped link, verify the original source, and cite that independent check. See Evidence and citations for the full attribution pattern.

Know the beta limits that affect the answer

These boundaries belong next to the conclusion because each can create a false comparison or false absence claim.

Uneven coverage

Company, speaker, channel, and date coverage varies. More returned findings do not prove greater executive emphasis.

Publication dates

The listed date is the video publication or upload date, not necessarily the recording, conference, or broadcast date.

Sourced summaries

FactIQ does not return raw media transcript text. Exact wording and tone require checking the timestamped source.

Result limits

A search returns at most 50 rows. Narrow by company, person, date window, appearance type, or kind of finding.

Absence

Say no matching structured finding appeared in the covered, bounded search—not that the executive never discussed the topic.

How media search finds a match

Media search is lexical and deterministic. It searches precomputed, public-safe summaries and appearance metadata; it does not watch or transcribe a video on demand.

Use a short, concrete topic and retry the product, policy, or phrase the company itself uses. If the first result is noisy, narrow the executive, company, dates, venue, or kind of finding.